
Behind the Price Tag: The Impact of Low-Quality Goods
Toxic Trade-Offs: the health and environmental risks of cheap manufacturing.
WORDS Lisa Sternfeld
Toxic Trade-Offs: the health and environmental risks of cheap manufacturing.
WORDS Lisa Sternfeld
In an age where convenience and affordability often dominate consumer choices, low-quality, mass-produced home products have become ubiquitous in households worldwide. From furniture to textiles, these products attract customers with their budget-friendly prices and contemporary designs. However, the environmental and human costs of producing these items are far from negligible. Beneath the appealing price tags lies a darker reality; the production of these goods often devastates natural ecosystems, emits high levels of pollutants, and subjects laborers – many of whom live in already vulnerable regions – to exploitative and unsafe working conditions.
Polluted river in the Philippines. Photo courtesy of Sascha Burkard / Adobe
Cheap mass production relies heavily on nonrenewable resources and harmful chemicals that degrade the environment. To cut costs, manufacturers frequently source synthetic materials like plastic, polyester and composite woods that have long-term environmental repercussions. Polyester, for instance, is a petroleum-based fiber used in countless home products, from curtains to bed linens. Its production not only contributes to global oil dependency but also releases microplastics into waterways and oceans. These microplastics find their way into marine ecosystems, harming wildlife and, ultimately, human health as they travel up the food chain. Studies have found microplastics in human blood, the heart, and the brain – essentially every organ in our bodies. Humans ingest between 78,000 and 211,000 microplastic particles per year through the air, food and water, posing significant health risks.
"Cheap mass production relies heavily on nonrenewable resources and harmful chemicals that degrade the environment."
Several regions around the world bear the brunt of the environmental exploitation associated with cheap mass production. In Southeast Asia, countries like Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines face significant environmental degradation due to resource extraction and pollution linked to furniture and textile manufacturing. Indonesia, for instance, is home to vast rainforests that are being rapidly depleted to supply wood for cheap furniture products, often through illegal logging. This deforestation threatens biodiversity, endangers indigenous wildlife like the critically endangered Sumatran tiger and orangutan, and disrupts the global carbon cycle. Rivers and water systems in these areas are also polluted by industrial runoff, especially from textile factories that dump chemicals directly into waterways, contaminating drinking water and damaging marine life.
Mass-produced furniture often uses composite wood products like MDF (medium-density fiberboard), which contain formaldehyde – a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) linked to respiratory issues and cancer. MDF and similar composites are made from wood scraps bound together with adhesives that emit VOCs over time. When discarded, these products contribute to pollution, as they are challenging to recycle due to their synthetic components. This ‘throwaway culture’ is escalating landfill volumes, with many discarded products taking hundreds of years to break down and leaking toxic chemicals into the soil and water.
A handloom weaver preparing yarns in India. Photo courtesy of Ruma / Adobe
The low prices of mass-produced home products are made possible by a reliance on inexpensive labor, frequently sourced from economically disadvantaged regions. In countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam and China, where labor costs are low, factory workers often endure long hours, unsafe conditions and minimal pay. This exploitative model prioritizes profit over the welfare of workers, with many factories failing to provide adequate ventilation, ergonomic equipment or even basic safety measures.
Bangladesh and India are central to the textile and garment industry, where low-cost production is achieved at a high human cost. In Bangladesh, for example, the garment sector employs millions, but workers often face poor working conditions, long hours and low wages. The Rana Plaza factory collapse in 2013 exposed the dangers of poorly regulated factory environments, where structural failures, overcrowding, and a lack of basic safety standards can lead to catastrophic outcomes. These regions illustrate the high stakes of low-cost production – where environmental depletion and human exploitation go hand-in-hand to meet the global demand for cheap products.
"Textile workers are regularly exposed to toxic dyes and chemicals without proper protective equipment."
Textile workers are regularly exposed to toxic dyes and chemicals without proper protective equipment. Many factories still use azo dyes, a group of synthetic dyes linked to cancer, as well as skin and respiratory irritations. For workers who spend long hours in direct contact with these substances, the health risks are severe. In addition, many textile and furniture factories operate under high-demand pressures, enforcing ‘fast fashion’ production schedules that leave workers vulnerable to injury and burnout.
The exploitation doesn’t end at factory doors. Many factory jobs are filled by migrant workers or individuals who rely on these positions for basic survival, creating a workforce that is afraid to speak up against unfair treatment. In some instances, child labor is also reported in these industries. The power imbalance between employers and workers is stark, with workers often facing a lack of legal protection, limited union representation, and no viable means to advocate for better wages or conditions.